Daniel Milavsky vs Adam Farag Cao Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Milavsky vs A. Farag Cao

Daniel Milavsky
USA
l
w
w
w
w
w
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
24
Age
18
-
Height
-
384
C. Rank
0
384
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Adam Farag Cao
CAN
w
w
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
24
Age
18
-
Height
-
384
C. Rank
0
384
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Milavsky 1 - 0 Cao
They have played 1 sets in total, with Daniel Milavsky winning 1 and Adam Farag Cao winning 0. The last match between Daniel Milavsky and Adam Farag Cao was at the M15 Sherbrooke, 06-03-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Daniel Milavsky getting the victory 6-3 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Milavsky | 1 |
| Cao | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Sherbrooke(03-06-25)
Daniel Milavsky
6
Adam Farag Cao
3
D. Milavsky vs A. F. Cao H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 67.37% (64-31) | Career Total W/L | 47.06% (24-27) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
D. Milavsky vs A. F. Cao Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Daniel Milavsky has won 46.52% of points on their second serve, while Adam Farag Cao has won 37.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Daniel Milavsky, in recent form, has won 43.53% of their opponent's second serve points, while Adam Farag Cao has won 45.31%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.23% and 24.16% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Daniel Milavsky has saved 54.55% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Adam Farag Cao has saved 57.46% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Daniel Milavsky has won 70.83% of matches played (W/L 51/21), with Adam Farag Cao winning 45.95% (W/L 17/20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Daniel Milavsky has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 77% (W/L 20/6), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Adam Farag Cao has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 77% (W/L 10/11), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 14/16).
- Player level: In the last year, Daniel Milavsky has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 80.00% of matches (W/L 40/10), where as Adam Farag Cao has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48.57% of matches (W/L 17/18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Daniel Milavsky winning 0 times and Adam Farag Cao being victorious 0 times. They have played 1 sets in total, with Daniel Milavsky winning 1 and Adam Farag Cao winning 0.
- The last match between Daniel Milavsky and Adam Farag Cao was at the M15 Sherbrooke, 06-03-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Daniel Milavsky getting the victory 6-3 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:39:44.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Daniel Milavsky has played against opponents with an average rank of 421.64 while Adam Farag Cao has played against players with an average rank of 23.65.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Daniel Milavsky has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Adam Farag Cao has won 80% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Daniel Milavsky has converted 29.96% of breakpoint opportunities, and Adam Farag Cao has converted 23.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Daniel Milavsky vs Adam Farag Cao Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Milavsky vs A. F. Cao H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 6 | Games Won | 3 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:39:44 | Average Match Time | 0:39:44 |
| 69% (18/26) | 1st Serve % | 55% (18/33) |
| 89% (16/18) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (12/18) |
| 50% (4/8) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (7/15) |
| 20% (1/5) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (14/33) | Return Points Win % | 23% (6/26) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Milavsky 52%, Cao 43%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Milavsky 51%, Cao 48%.
Break Points Saved %: Milavsky 64%, Cao 60%.
D. Milavsky Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 3-6 7-6(6) | ||
R1 | W | 6-0 3-6 6-1 | ||
F | W | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | ||
A. F. Cao Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 7-6(5) 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(6) 3-6 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Q3 | L | 5-0 ret. | ||

D. Milavsky vs A. F. Cao Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.37% (64/31) | YTD Win/Loss | 47.06% (24/27) |
| 63.11% (142/83) | Sets Win/Loss | 48.62% (53/56) |
| 55.25% (1190/964) | Games Win/Loss | 50.55% (509/498) |
| 66.13% (41/21) | Hard Win/Loss | 47.62% (10/11) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 76.92% (20/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 46.67% (14/16) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.42 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 440 | Aces Total | 74 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 294 | Total Double Faults | 103 |
| 1:32:24 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 370.55 | Average Opponent Rank | 17.16 |
| 61% (3431/5663) | 1st Serve % | 52% (858/1637) |
| 72% (2467/3431) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (576/858) |
| 52% (1153/2232) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (345/778) |
| 41% (244/591) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 34% (48/141) |
| 40% (2298/5712) | Return Points Win % | 36% (563/1564) |
| 50.00% (11/11) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 72.60% (53/20) | Futures W/L | 50.00% (24/24) |
| 66% (61/92) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (24/49) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 39% (11/28) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (3/8) |
| 56% (20/36) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (4/9) |
| 89% (61/54) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (25/22) |
| 10% (61/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (25/3) |
| 26% (34/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (26/2) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
02:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction12:30 PM 16/11/25
Prediction11:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction07:00 AM 16/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Simona Waltert Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Auger-Aliassime Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
H2H 5-10
H2H 0-0
23:05
H2H 1-0
00:10
H2H 0-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal