Daniel Milavsky vs Adam Farag Cao Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W L W L
Form
W L W W L L W L W LHead To Head: Milavsky 1 - 0 Cao
They have played 1 sets in total, with Milavsky winning 1 and Cao winning 0. The last match between Milavsky and Cao was at the M15 Sherbrooke, 06-03-2025, Second, I.hard with Daniel Milavsky getting the victory 6-3 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daniel Milavsky | 1 |
| Adam Farag Cao | 0 |
M15 Sherbrooke(06-03-2025)
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fett VS Ruzic PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Krueger VS Potapova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 ret. |
Stats 
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Adam Farag Cao
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve %
55%
(
18 of
33)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
6 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
34
Total Points Won
25
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 6 | Games Won | 3 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:39:44 | Average Match Time | 0:39:44 |
| 69% (18/26) | 1st Serve % | 55% (18/33) |
| 89% (16/18) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (12/18) |
| 50% (4/8) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (7/15) |
| 20% (1/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (14/33) | Return Points Win % | 23% (6/26) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Daniel Milavsky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Daniel Milavsky
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
5
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Attila Boros
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
19 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
92)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Daniel Milavsky
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
6
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Alfredo Perez
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Brian Bozemoj
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Adam Farag Cao
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve %
55%
(
18 of
33)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
6 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
34
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Edward Winter
65%
(
77 of
118)
1st Serve %
61%
(
80 of
131)
17
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
58 of
77)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
52 of
80)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
34%
(
40 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
55 of
131)
133
Total Points Won
116
|
6-7(6) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Guillaume Dalmasso
63%
(
76 of
121)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
102)
7
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
8
80%
(
61 of
76)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
45 of
55)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
32%
(
39 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
32 of
102)
114
Total Points Won
109
|
6-4 6-7(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Sebastian Gima
63%
(
80 of
128)
1st Serve %
54%
(
67 of
123)
5
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
42%
(
20 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
52 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
123)
130
Total Points Won
121
|
6-2 6-7(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Dan Martin
55%
(
52 of
95)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
89)
3
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
0
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
37%
(
16 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 2-6 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Adam Farag Cao Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jesse Flores
Player
Adam Farag Cao
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
43%
(
35 of
82)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
13 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Farag Cao
Player
Peter Alam
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Adam Farag Cao
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve %
55%
(
18 of
33)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
6 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
34
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Farag Cao
Player
Hoyoung Roh
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 4-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 71% (30/12) | Win/Loss | 52% (13/12) |
| 67% (66/33) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (30/24) |
| 57% (543/408) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (267/233) |
| 70% (16/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) |
| 50% (2/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 80% (12/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43% (6/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 144 | Aces Total | 40 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 129 | Total Double Faults | 40 |
| 1:19:43 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 301.4 | Average Opponent Rank | 173.84 |
| 60% (1270/2132) | 1st Serve % | 51% (357/705) |
| 72% (918/1270) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (249/357) |
| 49% (423/862) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (176/347) |
| 45% (104/229) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (25/59) |
| 42% (872/2065) | Return Points Win % | 37% (250/673) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 71% (30/12) | Futures W/L | 54% (13/11) |
| 70% (28/40) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (13/24) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 36% (4/11) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 53% (8/15) | Deciding Set Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 90% (29/26) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (15/12) |
| 10% (29/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (15/3) |
| 31% (13/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (10/1) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
